History

A tour of Wigmore Castle

A tour of Wigmore Castle

Stepping into the past

Recently in August 2020, I was lucky enough to get the chance to visit Wigmore castle, home of the medieval Mortimer family. Wigmore is sadly in a severely neglected and dilapidated state, having been abandoned to the ravages of time and mother nature. The wooden steps up to the keep have now rotted away and the paths are overgrown with vegetation. Access to the keep is by fighting through weeds, but those who do make the effort will be rewarded with magnificent views over the surrounding Welsh Marches. The castle is remarkably well situated to give commanding views over the whole landscape.

Here was where the Mortimers held court, where treaties were signed, marriage alliances brokered, and great banquets held. Looking out over the quiet and secluded landscape, with only birds and the wildlife for company, it’s quite hard today to imagine a castle in its prime. This would have been a busy place, brimming with activity. Lord Mortimer would ride out at the head of his retinue, and upon his return, one imagines a sudden flurry of activity, as servants, cooks, groomsmen and sentries were all hurried into action. There would have been great hunts in the forests nearby, to supply meat for the castle table. A great boar’s head perhaps, to celebrate an important victory. Outside the castle, the landscape would have been quite wild to our eyes. Though the valley was mostly cleared of trees and dotted with small farms, rivers ran unobstructed, while wolves still lived in the dense Welsh woods close by.

The castle ruins

Surrounding Wigmore castle is a thick curtain wall, with concentric stone towers guarding its corners. Due to their strong foundations, it is these towers that have best survived the weathering of the past half millennium. Entry to the castle is through a large, well defended gate house, the only entrance in ancient times. Another exit might have been through a small, hidden doorway allowing the garrison to sally out of the castle. Around the inside of the curtain wall, wooden buildings were built right up to the edge of the stonework. These would have included the stables, blacksmiths, fletchers and other such quarters. Evidence for these among other parts of the castle has been unearthed in archaeological digs.

From the castle it is possible to see the village of Wigmore, and the remains of Wigmore Abbey in the distance, where nearly all members of the medieval Mortimer family were buried. With the glistening towers of Wigmore Castle looking over both the abbey and village, this whole setting would have been quite a site indeed!

Here begins our tour of Wigmore.

Related articles

Read more about the medieval Mortimers and their exploits in the Welsh Marches.

Posted by David Mortimer in History, Medieval Mortimers, 0 comments
Unlocking the history of place names

Unlocking the history of place names

 A closer look at place names

Every town or village in the UK has its own story to tell. Often just looking at a place name can reveal a snippet of interesting information about a location.

The British Isles has a collective heritage from thousands of years of settlement and invasion by various peoples. The first to pass their unique heritage to place names were the native Britons, or Celts, who originally came from Central Europe and were a part of a much wider movement of European peoples and sharing of culture during the Iron Age.

A quick background

The Celts settled all corners of the British Isles, and eventually divided into three groups, the Irish, the Picts in what is now Scotland, and the Britons who inhabited the regions of modern England and Wales.

Next came the Romans, who eventually conquered the lands of the Britons, but eventually merged with the native population, creating what is now seen as a distinct Romano-British culture. Hadrians Wall separated the Roman province of Brittania and Caledonia, which continued to be ruled by the Picts. The Romans called the island of Ireland Hibernia.

When the Romans abandoned Britain in 410 AD, huge changes were afoot. At the same time as the Barbarian invasions which ripped the Western Roman Empire apart, Britain witnessed wide scale migrations and civil strife, in an era now termed the Dark Ages, due to the lack of written records.

A tribe from what is now Cumbria in England moved South West and became the Welsh, while a tribe from Northern Ireland known as the Scots conquered the Picts and gave their name to Scotland.

Beginning in the mid 5th century, the Brits were terrorised by invading Germanic hordes from Northern Continental Europe- the Saxons, Angles and Jutes. The Saxons were most numerous but it was the Angles who gave their name to what is now England.

The Saxons converted to Christianity in the 7th century, and established the Anglo Saxon Heptarchy, a realm of seven different petty kingdoms which governed England.

However, the British Isles had not suffered the last of foreign invasions. The fearsome pagan Vikings marked their arrival in England by attacking the monastery at Lindisfarne, Northumbria, in 793 in a notorious raid now subject to legend. The Vikings made an indelible mark on the whole of Britain, and many other parts of Europe, which has stood the test of time.

This distinctive heritage from so many different cultures is what gives Britain its collective identity. Throughout the UK, place names can be observed which bear witness to the tumultuous events of Britain’s past. Here is a description of the different roots of British place names, by language or culture, that should help to discover what the origin is for the vast majority of British place names.

How places were named

Before the development of settlements, the early inhabitants of Britain simply gave names to noteworthy natural features, such as hills, valleys, mountains rivers, islands and shorelines. Original settlements were built in important strategic or trading locations, like on a river, the mouth of a river, a confluence, or on a hill or ridge overlooking surroundings. The development of a place name often combined names for multiple features, such as the mouth of a certain river.

The Britons

In ancient times the Britons inhabited the southern half of the island of Great Britain, what is now England and Wales. The Britons spoke the Common Brittonic language, which is represented today by Welsh, Cornish- a virtually extinct local language, and Breton, which is spoken in a very small part of Brittany, France. Brittonic place names reflect the ancient British landscape. The Britons had many different words for geographic features, including the hills, streams, valleys and woods which characterised the landscape.

The Brittonic word for hill was ‘bre’, in Welsh is ‘bryn’, while the summit of a hill was the ‘ben’. Areas of upland were called ‘blen’. The Welsh for slope is ‘rhiw’. A valley was ‘cwm’. A more narrow river valley might have been called ‘glen’. The word ‘pen’ designated the headlands. Rivers were called ‘afon’, like the river Avon. The source of the water was called ‘blaen’ while the mouth of a river was the ‘aber’. A crossing or ford of the river would have been called ‘rhyd’. The Brittonic word for lake was ‘pol’, and an island was ‘ynys’. Britain had retained many of its ancient forests, which woods were called ‘coed’. A thicketed area was ‘cadgwith’. Descriptive terms applied to landscape features included ‘mawr’ for large, and ‘cul’ for narrow.

After Roman colonisation, the Christian Romano-Britons built settlements and churches, but were pushed back by the Saxons into the fringes of Britain, Wales and Cornwall. Here their words for built features gave rise to many place names recognised today. Perhaps the most important of these was ‘llan’, meaning parish, a small area centred around a church, which would have been the beating heart of any community. Villages were named after the patron saint of the parish church. Llan is probably related to the word for a group or community, reflected in the Scots-Gaelic word ‘clan’.

The Britons’ word for the church itself was ‘eglwys’ while a town was ‘din’ or ‘tre’. A monastery was ‘kil’. A port was called ‘porth’ – indeed one of the English words which comes from Brittonic. Areas were often contested between the Welsh and Saxons, or between different Welsh tribes. In these areas, the Welsh built forts ‘dinas’ and military camps ‘caer’.

Irish and Scots

In Ireland, people spoke the ancient Gaelic language, which shared a root with Bretonic. The Irish Dal Riada tribe spoke Gaelic and conquered the Picts north of Hadrian’s Wall. These people were the Scots, who settled the country we now know as Scotland. Thus Scottish place names bear a certain resemblance to places in Ireland.

In Old Irish, the words for hill or upland areas were ‘ard’ or ‘auchter’, while ‘ben’ meant summit. ‘Crag’ and ‘drum’ meant the crags and ridges, so symbolic of the Scottish highlands. A rocky hill was ‘knock’ similar to the Bretonic word ‘cwnyc’. The Old Gaelic for valley was ‘glen’, while ‘strath’ signified a wider valley.

The Scots Irish shared the Gaelic word ‘avon’ for river with the Britons. Where a river reached the sea was called ‘inver’. The Gaelic word for a lake or inlet was ‘loch’, one of the few Gaelic words still in widespread use outside the language. Gaelic descriptive terms included ‘more’, for large and ‘kyl’ for narrow.

The Irish and Scots built churches and farms and these are a significant source of place names. Many of these words sound similar to Bretonic. The Gaelic for church was ‘eglais’, and a monastery was ‘kil’. The Gaelic word ‘balla’ meant a farm or homestead. ‘Auch’ was the word for a field while a an enclosed field was a ‘gart’.

Anglo Saxon

The Anglo Saxons came from what is now Northern Germany, in the region bordering Denmark. The word English comes from the Angles, who invaded the Southern part of Britain with the Saxons. The Anglo Saxons spoke Old English, a West Germanic language, it’s oldest literary attestation is in the 7th century. The Anglo Saxons eventually conquered all of what is now England and divided into 7 independent kingdoms. As a result, the vast majority of English place names have an Anglo-Saxon origin. The early Anglo Saxons belonged to many distinct tribes who settled in different areas and owned their allegiance to different rulers. They were Christianised in the 7th century following the Gregorian Mission of 597. The Old English for tribe was ‘ing’. Settlements such as Reading and Hastings are named after the Readingas and Hestingas tribes.

Many Old English words can be understood today. A hill was a ‘dean’ while a valleys was called ‘dale’ or ‘vale’. The Bretonic word cwm for a small valley was adopted into English as ‘combe’ and described a small valley without a stream. ‘Hope’ meant an enclosed valley. The Old English for rocky or stony was ‘stan’.

In Old English a river was called ‘ax’, which can be observed with several rivers today, notably the Exe and Ax rivers in Devon. A ‘beck’ meant a small stream, while a large stream was termed ‘bourne’. A river was crossed at the ‘ford’. Many towns developed where rivers met the sea at their ‘mouth’, such as Exmouth, or Tynemouth. A lake was called ‘mere’ such as Windermere and an island ‘ey’. The word for a swamp was ‘moss’.

The Saxons had lots of words for wooded areas. The word ‘wood’ features in many place names. A ‘shaw’ meant thicket. The woodland edge was called ‘firth’ and a wooded hill ‘hurst’. In Old English, ‘wold’ or ‘weald’ denoted an elevated area of high woodland. The words for specific trees sometimes feature in place names, such as with ‘ash’, or ‘ack’ for oak, which bears similarity to the word acorn.

The origin of the word home is in ‘ham’ which was short for ‘hampstead’ or homestead. Likewise ‘stead’ meant a home. A ‘cot’ meant a cottage. The Saxons often guarded their settlements. An enclosed home was called ‘worthig’ meaning warded place, which was shortened to ‘worth’. Likewise ‘haeg’, shortened to ‘ey’ meant enclosure. The word ‘hay’ destined places enclosed by a hedge.

The word town comes from the Saxon word ‘ton’ for settlement. A ‘stoke’ was a little settlement or village, dependant on a nearby town. A ‘bury’ or ‘borough’ was a fortified town, originating from the old German word ‘burg’ meaning fortified. Most German towns built up around a castle end in this word. In Old English, the word for market was ‘chip’, such as London’s Eastcheap. On the coast, ‘pool’ meant a natural harbour, while a constructed wharf was called ‘hithe’. The Saxon word ‘port’ continues in unaltered form. After the Saxon settlement some Roman military forts, ‘castrums’, continued in use. In Old English, the Roman castrum was corrupted to become ‘cester’, forming a component of the many English towns with a Roman heritage, such as Gloucester and Chichester. Another English corruption of Latin was ‘wick’ from the Latin ‘vicus’ meaning trading place. Other influences of Latin on English place names include ‘street’, and the words for ‘magna’ large, and ‘parva’ small.

Though the Saxons invaded and attacked the Brits, they were also well known for their farming skills. Many Saxon place names derive from farms or fields. The Saxons settled areas and intermarried with local populations, also taking on some Bretonic words. A ‘leah’ meant a woodland area cleared for farming. ‘Farm’ and ‘field’ feature in many place names. The word ‘mead’ evolved into the word meadow. The Saxons also kept ‘shep’ sheep, ‘swine’ pigs and ‘kine’ cows, which give place names a pastoral connection.

After the conversion of the Saxons to Christianity, religion continued to play an important role in daily life. The church was a centre of the community. Important monasteries were called ‘minster’, while ‘stow’ described a holy location or place of pilgrimage.

The words for multiple features of a place were often rolled into one. The most common elements of place names was the name for specific rivers and farms. A further way of differentiating places was by designating their direction. The words for directions were ‘nor’ North, ‘ast’ East, ‘sud’ South, and ‘wes’ West. Examples include Northleigh and Southleigh in Devon. Most English place names developed by the 9th century, and words changed as the language evolved into Middle English, with more modern words like ‘market’ being added to places.

The Vikings began raiding the British Isles in the 8th century and were often in conflict with the Saxons. As well as ruling large parts of Scotland, the Vikings settled the East and North of England and ruled over an area known as the ‘Danelaw’, influencing place names in these areas. The Vikings spoke Old Norse which as a Germanic language had some similarities to Anglo Saxon (Old English). The Norse element in place names reflect the landscape features most important to the Vikings. In Old Norse the word for clearing was ‘thwait’ while ‘Howe’ meant a mound. Ridges were called ‘rigg’ and ravines ‘gill’. The word for inlet was ‘firth’, and ‘wick’ meant a bay. Waterfalls were called ‘foss’ while ‘keld’ meant a natural spring. In Old Norse, a ‘bost’ meant farm while a ‘toft’ was equivalent to a homestead. The Norse word ‘tun’ for town was similar to the Saxon ‘ton’. A village was called ‘by’, such as Whitby, and the Norse for road was ‘gate’. A church was called ‘kirk’.

What is the word origin of the town where you live? Post in the comments below!

Further reading:

Go a step further. Discover your surname origin!

Other recent posts:

An arrow in the dark. The story of Harold Godwinson, England’s last Saxon king, and the Battle of Hastings 1066

The Mortimers of Coedmore, Cardiganshire. An existing Mortimer family that can be traced back to Medieval times!

Posted by David Mortimer in History, 0 comments
An Arrow in the Dark

An Arrow in the Dark

Legacy

On 14 October 2016, thousands of people gathered in a field near Battle Abbey, Sussex. They had come to celebrate a re-enactment of the famous Battle of Hastings, one of the few dates that everyone can remember from the history books, 1066 – the year English history began! Or so it would seem from the collective national consciousness. England in fact had a proud history as a united kingdom, going back nearly 150 years before Hastings.

However by 1064, England had become entangled in national turmoil, as the ailing King Edward the Confessor was increasingly frail with no descendants to continue his legacy. To make matters worse, the kingdom was beset by foreign enemies, as jealous onlookers sought to steal the nation’s wealth and take advantage of the impending dearth of English unity. Across the North Sea were the Anglo-Saxons’ old foe, the Danes, who had invaded England many times over. The Welsh, Scots and Irish were emboldened by the waning of England’s defences, while restless powers in Normandy dreamed of conquering a new prize. Complicating the matter further, King Edward had family ties to both ruling houses in Denmark and Normandy. His mother Emma of Normandy had remarried to Edward’s predecessor King Canute, the Danish-born ruler of England, Denmark and Norway. King Edward had a close connection to Normandy through his mother’s family and had spent years in exile there before his own accession to the throne. Throughout his reign Edward embarked on a Normanisation of England bringing in many Norman advisers, clerics and courtiers.

Rise of the Godwins

Though Edward had a natural heir in his great nephew Edgar the Aetheling, Edgar was young and ill-equipped to deal with the numerous threats to English sovereignty. To this end stepped up the king’s brother in law Harold Godwinson, Earl of Wessex, the second most powerful figure in the land. A capable military leader, Harold was imbued with confidence following victory over the Welsh and Gruffydd ap Llewelyn in 1063. What young Edgar lacked, Harold possessed in spades- vast wealth, courtly influence, and universal respect among peers. If anyone was to guard England’s interests and defend against growing Norman influence at court, it would be Earl Harold.

Harold was born circa 1022 into a noble family, the son of Godwin, Earl of Wessex. As a powerful noble, his father had close ties to the previous regime of Canute, and conspired in the death of Edward’s brother Alfred Aetheling in the chaotic reign of Cnut’s son Harthacnut. Godwin had such influence that he acted as king maker in the succession of Edward in 1042, and arranged the hand in marriage of his daughter, Edith. They had no children and Edward harboured lingering resentment to the Godwins, banishing them in 1051. It was only through force of arms that Godwin compelled Edward to restore their estates. In such a malaise, Harold succeeded to the Earldom in 1053, making him an influential political figure.

Harold and his wife Edith Swann Hnesce or “gentle swan” were married in the Danish manner, as befitting the custom of the time. He earned his stripes in battles against Magnus king of Norway, and drove back the Welsh from Herefordshire, eventually defeating king Gruffydd ap Llewellyn in 1063. His star was clearly rising, and it would not be long before Harold controlled all England.

A mysterious voyage

It is quite unknown how Harold ended washed up on the coast of Ponthieu in 1064, but he had presumably sailed from Sussex on a mission shrouded in secrecy. He had the misfortune of being blown off course and shipwrecked, then captured and held hostage by Guy Count of Ponthieu. Ten years previous, Guy had lost against Normandy in the battle of Mortemer, 1054. As Normandy’s vassal, he handed over Harold to the Norman duke William, who seemingly treated him well. Harold joined the duke’s retinue and fought for William against his rival Conan, Duke of Brittany. The campaign was successful and Harold was knighted by him, having saved two of his men from the perils of quicksand near Mont St Michel. The two nobles struck an agreement and parted ways, though the substance of such a bargain remains a matter of great contention. The Normans maintained that Harold swore an oath of fealty to Duke William and supported his claim to the English throne, in apparent fulfillment of a promise by Edward the Confessor. If the king had made such a promise, he truly had lost his marbles, for it was the Witenaġemot, or counsel of eoldermen, that decided on the English kingship. It was certainly not the place of either Harold or any other noble to promise the crown to William.

Harold’s younger brother Tostig became Earl of Northumbria, though was deeply unpopular. Considering the threat from William, Harold was forced to exile him in 1065 to ensure loyalty in the north. Tostig grew bitterly resentful of Harold and plotted vengeance, scheming to overthrow him with the help of Baldwin Count of Flanders. The following year, Tostig raided the coast and invaded England, though was forced to retreat to Scotland. He would later lend his support to the Norse.

Succession

The passing of a monarch in medieval Europe was always a momentous event, though in the case of England in 1066 the stakes were higher than ever. As king Edward the Confessor lay on his death bed, he commended the kingdom to his widow Edith, and entrusted the nation’s protection to his then reconciled brother in law Harold Godwinson. King Edward died on 5 January, and power shifted rapidly to Earl Harold. Confirmed king by Witan convened the following morning, Harold was crowned, perhaps at Westminster. Knowing that William of Normandy had designs on his kingdom, he rapidly moved to consolidate power and prepare England’s defences. William immediately planned to invade following news of Harold’s succession, preparing a fleet of over seven hundred ships. When Harold discovered William’s plans he levied an army to counter the threat, but was forced to disband troops when the invasion did not immediately materialise. In April Halley’s comet appeared in the sky, marking an omen of change, the comet became associated with England’s succession crisis.

The Norman fleet was forced back through bad weather, and the first threat came instead from king Harald Hardrada of Norway, convinced by Tostig to invade England. In September 1066 Harald’s invasion fleet of 300 ships sailed up the Humber. It was at Fulford, Yorkshire that the invaders clashed in battle with English earls Edwin and Morcar, where the English forces suffered defeat. Harold Godwinson was forced to mobilise his troops, including an elite force of huscarls. In only four days, the king marched his army up the old Roman road of Ermine Street to York, surprising the invaders at Stamford Bridge. Many of the Norwegian forces had stayed behind to guard the fleet, and some were without armour. Harald’s forces retreated across the bridge, where a single Norse axeman held up the advance of the English before being slain. The Norse made a shield wall and the English outflanked them and charged. The fighting was intense and lasted most of the day, though the English won a complete victory. Both Harald Hardada and Tostig were killed and the Norse army virtually extinguished. Harold accepted a surrender from the remaining Norwegians, and the survivors sailed away in only 24 ships.

Hastings

William of Normandy’s original invasion fleet was blown off course by bad weather. King Harold had in response summoned the fyrd, an Anglo Saxon fighting force of landowners. William’s fleet of over 700 ships sailed in September and landed at Pevensey. The Normans fortified their position and sacked local settlements. Such an invasion could not have come at a worse time for Harold, who was travelling down to London after fighting the Norwegians, having left many forces in the north, including the Earls Morcar and Edwin. Harold’s army hurried south averaging 27 miles a day. Tired from the exertion, the English encamped near Hastings. All overtures of diplomacy failed and the two armies seemed destined to meet on the field of battle. Both forces had over 7,000 men, though Harold’s army was infantry while the Norman’s were composed of infantry, cavalry and archers. Harold’s brothers Gyrth and Leofwine were loyal to him and would fight alongside him.

On the day of confrontation, Harold deployed his troops in a dense formation atop a steep slope, with the flanks protected by woodland. To attack, the Normans were forced to cross marshy land in front of them, though the Anglo Saxons had no archers to take advantage of the  slope. In response, William divided his forces into three groups, the Bretons, Normans, and French, taking charge the Norman division personally. Alan the Red commanded the Bretons while William FitzOsbern ordered the French.

The battle commenced with the Norman archers firing at the English infantry, though the defenders formed a shield wall and the arrows had little effect. After running out of arrows, the Norman spearmen advanced uphill, and were caught off-guard by a volley of spears. The two sides clashed, and the English shield wall held strong against the Normans. The battle continued in such vein for some time, before a lull in the fighting. Failing to gain advantage, the Norman forces withdrew from battle temporarily.

Hoping to force a path through the opposing infantry, William commanded a frontal cavalry charge against the defensive line. In the general melee that ensued the English resisted the Norman assault manfully, while fighting the attackers back with vigour. The Normans were losing men and ground, as the Anglo Saxons took confidence from their excellent position. Harold’s army was gaining the upper hand, and the Normans began to retreat, beginning with the Breton flank. Duke William had no less than two horses killed from under him, and was forced to retreat on several occasions. Around the battlefield there were cries that William had been killed, and Norman soldiers and mounted knights fell back in disarray. The defending English pursued in earnest, though Harold ordered his men to stand ground. Despite the order, many of the English followed the Normans, perhaps lead by Harold’s brothers Gyrth and Leofwine.

It was at this point that William lifted up his helmet to show he was alive, and rallied the Normans around him. The English in their rush down the hillside had lost their defensive formation and suffered terribly against the renewed Norman charge. Gyrth and Leofwine fell in the fighting, and Harold was eventually surrounded, protected only by his elite guard of huscarls. Harold fell in battle against the Normans. Seeing the death of

 

  1. The earliest records mention only that Harold was killed in the battle. His body was mutilated but was later identified by Harold’s fair widow Edith, who recognised his body by “certain marks familiar only to her”. This suggests that Harold was killed in a melee combat. The story of Harold being killed by an arrow appears only later, by a writer who had neither first hand knowledge or experience of the battle. Crucially this was after the creation of the Bayeux Tapestry.
  2. Harold apparently went back on his word to William according to the Normans, having promised William the throne in the succession of the Kingdom of England. This was the main justification given for the Norman conquest of England. For a long time before this period in the Middle Ages the punishment for dishonesty was to lose an eye. Therefore it’s hardly surprising that later chronicles might attempt to revise history to say that Harold was killed by an arrow in the eye, which would be interpreted as divine punishment and reinforce William’s right to rule.
  3. One of the main sources of evidence cited in support of Harold being killed by an arrow is the Bayeux Tapestry. As a detailed illustration created soon after the Battle of Hastings, it is seen as an important near contemporary source of information for the events of the Norman invasion. A closer inspection of the tapestry reveals that the illustrated narrative does indeed support the earliest historical records of the battle. At the part of Harold’s death, the tapestry reads Harold Rex Interfectus Est. (King Harold has been killed). Below the second part of the writing the tapestry shows a Saxon fighter being killed by a mounted Norman knight.
  4. To the left of this warrior’s death, there is a soldier who it seems is struck by an arrow in the head. This figure can be clearly identified as a Saxon. The word Harold appears immediately above his head which for a long time has been assumed in support of identifying the man as Harold, king of England. However, the writing does not conclusively identify the individual as Harold. In many other places in the tapestry, writing refers to events taking place in the tapestry not immediately below the writing, and this is quite reasonably the case here. This is especially so if the Saxon on the left is not shown as being killed.
  5. The Bayeux tapestry as we see it today was restored in the 18th century. Sketches of the tapestry before the restoration do not show the arrow, and as such it is the result of a later alteration. The most likely interpretation is the Saxon soldier was carrying a spear. During the restoration the spear was partly removed and fletching added to form an arrow. This was done to align the tapestry to the arrow story which by that time was widely accepted. Upon close inspection of the tapestry this is still obvious today, as the line of the arrow angles over the top of the victim’s heard. Once the support for the arrow from the Bayeux tapestry can be discarded, the majority of supporting evidence for the above assertion falls away.
  6. Friendly fire? In the tapestry, Harold is killed in a brutal melee at a point nearing the end of the battle, after the battle turned in favour of the Normans. By this point the Normans had carried out several charges and pressed the Saxon defence to breaking point. Once the melee had begun, the Normans would not have fired arrows at their own knights or their leader Duke William, who was heavily involved in the throng of fighting. Research suggests the tapestry is an accurate depiction of contemporary warfare and is corroborated by archaeological findings.
  7. The Saxons fought in a shield wall, a technique long practiced by the Saxon peoples, and originally created in antiquity. To form the wall each soldier would hold up their shield and raise their spear, and would initiate this formation at the prospect of a cavalry charge. A close look at the tapestry in this scene shows that the soldier hit by an arrow is holding arm in the same position as the soldier to the left of him who is carrying a spear.
  8. The angle of the supposed arrow hitting the Saxon in the head is completely wrong and on reflection, has always seemed a bit strange. During a battle, archers would engage the enemy army by firing a volley into the mass of opposing troops, angling their bows upwards. This means arrows would rain down on the unfortunate victims from above. The arrow would not have hitting Harold at such an angle unless the archer was lying on the ground in front of him!

So it is that the myth of an arrow in the eye was born.

Posted by David Mortimer in History, 1 comment
Mortimer History

Mortimer History

Welcome to Mortimer History!

The site dedicated to Mortimer family history, genealogy and many other historical subjects

Mortimer coat of arms- Medieval stained glass

Medieval Mortimers

Devonshire Mortimers

My Mortimer Story

Resources

Search the site